Disclaimer

  • The information contained in this blog is provided for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and should not be construed as providing legal advice on any subject matter

« July 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

August 2007

August 09, 2007

Additional Insured Provision Did Not Protect GC For Completed Operations

Weitz v. Mid-Century Insurance (Colo. App. 2007)

The Court of Appeals held that an additional insured provision in a subcontractor's policy that is meant to protect the general contractor did not apply to completed operations because it, by its terms, applied only to "ongoing operations." Said another way, the endorsement that extends coverage to the general contractor against its liability “arising out of [the subcontractor’s] ongoing operations” does not insure the general contractor against liability arising out of the subcontractor’s “completed operations.”

Read slip opinion

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

April 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30